An Obsidian or Notion alternative for D&D campaigns you actually record
Most DMs who use a campaign tool use one of these two, because they already had it. They are both good, both cheap or free, and both stop at exactly the same place.
The short version
Obsidian is free for every purpose and keeps your notes as plain files on your own disk, which is a genuinely excellent deal. Notion is better for a group that edits together. Neither turns your session audio into notes: Obsidian has no transcription at all, and Notion’s meeting-notes AI sits on its Business plan and is not built for a four-hour game.
The numbers, with sources
| What | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Obsidian base app | Free for all purposes including commercial use — the Commercial licence became optional, and is now a $50 USD per user per year support purchase | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
| Obsidian Sync | $4 USD per user/month billed annually, or $5 billed monthly (Standard, 1 GB) | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
| Obsidian Publish | $8 USD per site/month billed annually, or $10 billed monthly | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
| Obsidian audio capability | The Audio recorder core plugin records and saves an audio file into a note. There is no transcription. | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
| Notion plans | Free $0; Plus $12 per member/month billed monthly or $10 billed annually; Business $24 billed monthly or $20 billed annually | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
| Notion free plan file uploads | Capped at 5 MB per file | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
| Notion AI Meeting Notes | Requires the Business or Enterprise plan | sourceas of 2026-07-31 |
What each is actually good at
Obsidian is local-first Markdown. Your campaign is a folder of text files on your own disk, it works offline, and it is free — including for commercial use, which changed and is worth knowing if you assumed otherwise. The plugin ecosystem is large and several plugins are aimed squarely at tabletop games. Nothing here is a compromise.
Notion is the opposite trade: cloud, real-time multiplayer, and a database model that makes a linked NPC table genuinely pleasant to build. If your table shares notes and edits them together during a session, Notion does something Obsidian does not — Obsidian is built single-player first, and sharing a vault means layering a sync service on top rather than opening a built-in live document.
Where both stop
Neither converts a recording into notes. Obsidian will record audio into a note and leave it there as an audio file. Notion has AI meeting notes, but they are on the Business plan and designed for a meeting, not for four hours of six people talking over dice with invented proper nouns throughout.
So the workflow ends the same way in both: you still sit down afterwards and type up what happened. The tool is a nicer place to put the notes, not a way to not write them.
There is also a practical snag with Notion’s free plan if you were thinking of storing session audio in it — uploads are capped at 5 MB per file, and a session recording is orders of magnitude larger than that. (A single DM Scribe upload takes up to 500 MB and 8 hours, audio or video, with the audio track extracted for you.)
The name problem, specifically
If you do wire up your own transcription in front of Obsidian — Whisper locally, say — the thing you will hit is fantasy proper nouns. A general transcription model has never seen your NPC names and will render them differently every session, so the same character ends up under several spellings and the notes stop being searchable.
That is the specific gap DM Scribe closes: the transcription is primed with your own campaign’s glossary, characters and recorded nicknames before it starts, so the names come back consistent. It is also why a general-purpose transcription tool bolted onto a general-purpose notes app tends to disappoint on exactly this workflow.
Keeping them is a legitimate plan
If your prep lives in Obsidian or Notion and you like it there, you do not have to move it. Transcripts and recaps export as plain text, and every plan can go the other way — bring transcripts you already have and let the AI chain build the campaign structure from them without spending transcription hours (two such imports a month free, ten on Dungeon Master, unlimited on Guild Master).
You should stay on Obsidian or Notion if…
You do not record your sessions. That is the whole test, and if the answer is no then everything DM Scribe does is unavailable to you and Obsidian at $0 is a better deal than anything we sell.
Pick Obsidian specifically if you want your campaign as plain files you own, offline, with no subscription. Pick Notion if your table edits together and you want the database views.
- You do not record, and do not want to start
- You want local plain-text files and full data ownership (Obsidian)
- Your players co-edit the campaign notes live (Notion)
- You want a free-form canvas rather than a structure derived from play
Other comparisons
- World Anvil
World Anvil is built for authoring a world before you play it. Remembering what happened while you did is a different job. Which one you actually need.
- Kanka
Kanka is free, open source and genuinely good — and every entry in it is one you typed. What changes when the notes come out of the session instead.
- LegendKeeper
LegendKeeper has the best editor and nested map atlas in this category. It has no transcription. Which problem you have decides which tool you want.
- Otter.ai
Otter caps a conversation at 30 minutes free and 90 on Pro. A D&D session runs four hours. What that costs to fix, with current prices and sources.
- Descript
Descript meters transcription as media minutes, and a four-hour session spends 240 of them. What each plan covers for a weekly game, with sources.
- Archivist AI
Archivist meters sessions, we meter hours. That one difference decides which is cheaper for your table, and it is not the same answer for everyone.
- The DM's ARK
The DM’s ARK tags who spoke; we do not. We have a free plan that never expires; they do not. Those two facts decide most of it.