The DM’s ARK vs DM Scribe: speaker tags against a free tier
Another direct competitor, and the comparison is unusually clean because the two products differ on exactly two things a DM can check in an afternoon. They produce speaker-tagged transcripts and we produce unattributed ones. We have a permanent free plan and they have a 30-day trial and nothing after it.
The short version
If knowing who said which line matters to you, The DM’s ARK does something we genuinely do not, and no amount of the rest of this page changes that. If it does not matter, the decision comes down to price shape: they start cheaper at $6 but have no free tier, and we have a free tier that does not expire.
The numbers, with sources
| What | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| The DM's ARK — Squire plan | $6/month — 1 active campaign | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| The DM's ARK — Archivist plan | $10/month — 3 active campaigns, document uploads, campaign recaps | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| The DM's ARK — Loremaster plan | $15/month — unlimited active campaigns, full Compendium, early features | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| The DM's ARK — free tier | 30-day free trial on all plans; no free tier after the trial | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| The DM's ARK — speaker tagging | Advertises speaker-tagged transcripts | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| The DM's ARK — inputs | Discord bot recording and uploaded audio (MP3, WAV, M4A, FLAC) | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| DM Scribe — plans | Free: 2.5 hours/month + one-time 3 bonus hours; $7.99/month for 10 hours; $14.99/month for 30 hours | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
| DM Scribe — speaker tagging | None. Transcripts are unattributed. | sourceas of 2026-08-28 |
How we sourced this: The DM’s ARK has no dedicated pricing page — thedmsark.com/pricing returns 404 — so every figure above was read from its homepage on 2026-08-28, which is where its plan table lives. No annual pricing is quoted because none is shown. Hour or session allowances are not quoted either: the plans are described by active-campaign count and features, with no usage cap stated, and inventing one to make a tidier comparison table would be exactly the thing these pages exist to avoid. The speaker-tagging row records what the site advertises; we have not independently tested its accuracy and do not claim to have.
They tag speakers. We do not.
The DM’s ARK advertises speaker-tagged transcripts. We do not do speaker labelling at all — our transcript is the words, in order, without attribution — and we say so on every page where it could matter rather than leaving you to find out.
How much this is worth depends on what you do with the transcript. For a recap, attribution barely matters: what happened is what matters, and who narrated it rarely changes the summary. For an actual-play show pulling quotes, for settling who agreed to what, or for a table where one player’s arc is the point, it matters a great deal.
There is also a free way to get attribution with either tool, which is worth knowing before paying for it: record per-speaker tracks at source. Craig does this on Discord by default and Zoom will do it with one setting turned on.
The price shapes are genuinely different
The DM’s ARK runs $6 a month for one active campaign, $10 for three plus document uploads, and $15 for unlimited campaigns and the full Compendium. Every plan starts with a 30-day free trial, and their site states there is no free tier after it. Players get access free; only the DM pays — the same posture we take.
We are $7.99 for 10 hours a month and $14.99 for 30, with campaigns uncapped on both, plus a free plan of 2.5 hours a month that does not expire and 3 bonus hours at signup.
So their entry point is cheaper than ours by $1.99 and their top tier by nearly the same margin. What you are buying with the difference is our free tier and our hour allowance; what you give up is their campaign flexibility at the low end. If you run one campaign and play a lot, $6 for unlimited-length recording is hard to beat on price alone — and we would rather tell you that here than have you find it out after signing up.
What the two products actually overlap on
Almost everything else, at least at the level of description. Both record from Discord or an uploaded file, both accept the common audio formats, both produce automatic recaps, both track NPCs, locations and items into a browsable reference, and both let you ask questions of your own campaign history — their "Ask Scribe" against our Ask Your Campaign.
Where a genuine difference exists in that overlap, it is in what we do to transcription before it runs: we build a prompt from your campaign’s own glossary, character names and nicknames so invented proper nouns stay consistent between sessions. The DM’s ARK describes its transcription as tuned for D&D vocabulary, monster names and spell names — which is a real and similar idea, but a general D&D vocabulary and your specific campaign’s vocabulary are not the same thing, and only one of them knows your NPC is called Thordak.
We have not tested either product’s output against the other and are not going to claim ours is more accurate. That is exactly the sort of comparative capability claim this site does not make without evidence.
Pick The DM’s ARK if…
The strongest reason is the one we cannot match. If you want a transcript that says who spoke — for an actual-play show, for a table where individual arcs are the point, or simply because an unattributed wall of dialogue is hard to read — they advertise it and we do not do it. Take them.
- You run exactly one campaign and want the cheapest paid plan. At $6 their entry tier undercuts ours, and if you never need a second campaign you are not paying for headroom you will not use.
- You play long or frequent sessions and dislike usage caps. Their plans are described by campaign count with no stated hour allowance; ours are hours, and hours run out.
- You want unlimited campaigns at the lowest price. Their $15 Loremaster does that; our paid tiers also uncap campaigns but you would be choosing on hours instead.
Other comparisons
- World Anvil
World Anvil is built for authored worldbuilding. If your problem is capturing what happened at the table, that is a different job. An honest comparison.
- Kanka
Kanka is free, open source, and genuinely good. It still needs you to type every entry. Here is the honest comparison, including when to just use Kanka.
- LegendKeeper
LegendKeeper has the best editor and nested map atlas in this category. It has no transcription. Which problem you have decides which tool you want.
- Obsidian and Notion
Obsidian is free and local; Notion is collaborative and cloud. Neither transcribes your session. What that costs you, and when to keep using them.
- Otter.ai
Otter caps a conversation at 30 minutes free and 90 on Pro. A D&D session runs four hours. What that costs to fix, with current prices and sources.
- Descript
Descript meters transcription as media minutes, and a four-hour session spends 240 of them. What each plan covers for a weekly game, with sources.
- Archivist AI
Archivist meters sessions, we meter hours. That one difference decides which is cheaper for your table, and it is not the same answer for everyone.